The Martian

 One of the more impressive elements of The Martian, written by Andy Weir, is its impressive accuracy in portraying science and space. The author maintains a zealous commitment to this factor; not only does Weir have a background in computer science, but he studied and researched into subgenres of specific sciences that many space operas err on. In fact, the novel is credited to have reignited interest in space exploration and NASA’s program since the Cold War. However, this is not to say that the book is free of miniscule improbabilities. This cannot be helped, however, as Weir’s intention was probably also to create an interesting story with a plot.

It makes me think back to many of the space related movies and entertainment I’ve watched – and I’ve pondered on the accuracy of its portrayal in science. For example, I’ve long been a fan of Star Trek: The Original Series, and its subsequent reboots. And while there are plausible prospects in the science behind Star Trek, there are also many inaccuracies that have been gleamed over for the sake of the plot. Although there is scientific retort and discussion throughout the series, it certainly isn’t a hard science in the way Weir’s novel is.

Another example is the franchise Star Wars – and those films are perhaps even further from an accurate science than Star Trek is. Star Wars essentially incorporates the use of a supernatural force… The Force, which is similar to telekinesis, a psychic ability never proven throughout the course of human history. On the other hand, the majority of people don’t watch these franchises for the sake of accuracy…